I write code. I love logic. And I still know what beautiful is.
Of course, there is no true judge of artful things. However, artists still have a tendency to believe their eyes are not only different, but a better judge of artistic character, aesthetic presence, and visual impact. This is wrong, and I’ll tell you why.
I may not be a wonderful chef, but I know when my steak is under-cooked, or over-seasoned. I am not on any New York Times best-seller list, but I can tell who is a good novelist after a couple chapters. I can’t paint, but it is easy to see when someone has a grasp on lighting, shapes, and colors. I don’t have many music abilities, but I could spot the difference between a high school band, and a renowned symphony orchestra.
Being a good creator has no affect on your ability to consume, and no affect on your ability to judge– it may only affect your historical knowledge or appreciation of the subject matter. When you compose a piece of art, whether it be digital or mechanical, on canvas or on film, you must accept the interpretation of the consumer.
If you can bring new perspective to your artwork by telling a story, or bringing forth some element of enlightenment in those who consume it, you are truly a great artist. But if you think that because someone doesn’t see it your way, or find something more or less beautiful than you, do not blame it on their experience, their lifestyle, their career, or your ignorant predispositions about their ability to artistically, aesthetically, or visually intake something– blame it on your shitty art.